Saturday, November 3, 2012

Grunstad v. Cooper

Here in Bloomington, in camera interviews are not rare, as opposed to other surrounding counties, so this new case from the Appellate Court may be interesting to some in McLean County:

Grunstad v. Cooper

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Citation
Case Number: 
 2012 IL App (3d) 120524
Decision Date: 
 October 17, 2012
District: 
 3d Dist.
Division/County: 
 La Salle Co.
Justice: 
 CARTER
Holding: 
 Affirmed.
Court's custody decision reflected thorough consideration of evidence for custody, and did not err in granting mother's motion for directed verdict. Court was within its discretion in denying father's motion to conduct in camera interview of parties' 14-year-old child, as court had other evidence of child's custody preference. (HOLDRIDGE and McDADE, concurring.)

--
Jon D. McLaughlin
(309) 319-6206 


THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. ANY RECIPIENT OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS ADVISED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, COPYING, OR OTHER USE OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To the extent that this message or any attachment concerns tax matters, it is not intended to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law.

1 comment:

  1. Hey your comparison post really looked awesome,as i am a regular reader of your blog post i enjoyed it.
    Southern Utah Divorce Mediation

    ReplyDelete